From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG 2.6.7 hangs on boot (rx2600)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:11:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200406301111.04482.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040622061505.GA23075@cup.hp.com>
On Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:19 am, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> Jesse Barnes wrote on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:14 AM
>
> > > > > > I tried both of these on a machine that doesn't have memory at
> > > > > > the stock kernel load address, and it failed very early on.
> > > > > > However, it works with the attached patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me confirm what I understand:
> > > > > David's bk tree doesn't boot.
> > > > > David's bk tree + 2 patches I posted this morning doesn't boot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is that correct?
> > > >
> > > > Correct. David's tree hangs at a later point though, after printing
> > > > "Console: ... 80x25".
> > >
> > > I presume David's bk tree plus this patch also hung on your machine?
> > > http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/linux-ia64/0406/10162.html
> >
> > Yep. It gets as far as David's tree plus your patches from this morning.
>
> Looks like there are more places where kernel does "virt -> phys -> virt".
> And conversion from phys to virt is setting 3 msb to 1.
Yep, that looks like a problem. The kernel hangs right after the
local_flush_tlb_all in ia64_tlb_init, and if I comment it out I get a "Unable
to handle kernel paging request at virtual address a000003004289f70" which,
on sn2, looks like a virt -> phys -> virt conversion (i.e. 0x3004289f70 is a
valid physical address).
Jesse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-30 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-22 6:15 BUG 2.6.7 hangs on boot (rx2600) Grant Grundler
2004-06-22 13:50 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-22 14:51 ` Grant Grundler
2004-06-22 15:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-06-22 21:16 ` Grant Grundler
2004-06-22 21:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-06-22 22:28 ` Grant Grundler
2004-06-22 22:30 ` Grant Grundler
2004-06-22 22:38 ` Arun Sharma
2004-06-23 14:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2004-06-23 17:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-23 22:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-06-24 2:57 ` Tian, Kevin
2004-06-25 0:36 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-25 16:31 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-26 5:29 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-26 5:48 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-26 5:55 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-29 15:09 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-29 15:34 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-29 17:32 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-29 17:40 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-29 17:45 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-29 18:03 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-29 18:13 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-29 18:19 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-06-29 21:19 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-29 23:18 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-30 16:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-30 18:11 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2004-07-06 23:43 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-06 23:45 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-07 16:20 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-07 23:56 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-08 18:13 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-08 18:31 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-07-08 18:39 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-08 18:43 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-08 18:46 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-12 17:59 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200406301111.04482.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--to=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.