Re: [PATCH] PPC64: (resend) Janitor signature of rtas_call() routine

[linas@austin.ibm.com]

On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:33:16PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Linas,
> 
> > Can you please apply the following patch to the ameslab ppc64
> > tree, and/or roll it upwards to the marclello 2.6 tree?
> > This path is 100% pure cleanup; no functional changes.
> > 
> > I got irritated when I was given a -1 that was cast to an unsigned
> > int that was then cast to a signed (64-bit) long, and so I received
> > a value of 4 billion instead of -1.  This patch fixes this insanity.
> > 
> > Different files were treating this return code as being signed
> > or unsigned, 32-bit or 64-bit.  The 'real' return code is always
> > a signed 32-bit quantity, so this patch just makes the usage
> > consistent across the board.
> 
> I beat you to the punch on this one, I'm afraid. :)  I changed
> rtas_call to return an int in the prom cleanup patch I sent to Andrew
> last week.  You did spot a few places that I missed though, so I'll
> send Andrew a patch to fix those up shortly.

Well, your patch is not in the ameslab tree :( at least as of friday 
night.  I'm working off of ameslab, is there a different tree I should
follow at this time?

--linas