From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <michael.kerrisk@gmx.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Testing PROT_NONE and other protections, and a surprise
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:39:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040701123941.GC4187@mail.shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <736E7483-CB1B-11D8-947A-000393ACC76E@mac.com>
Kyle Moffett wrote:
> >Can you confirm in a simple way that mapping a file, or some anonymous
> >memory, without PROT_READ, really isn't writable under MacOS X? Can
> >you confirm it with a word write, if that would be relevant?
>
> I hope I didn't make some stupid mistake in my program, but here it
> is, and here are my results.
Thanks for testing, Kyle.
It looks fine, although this is wrong:
> mem = mmap(0,4096,PROT_WRITE,MAP_ANON|MAP_SHARED,-1,0);
> ...
> if (mem == 0) return 1;
The error code is -1, aka. MAP_FAILED.
> Starting...
> Mapped memory!
> Address is 4000
That's a surprisingly low address.
> Bus error
Phew, I'm glad I decided to catch SIGBUS in the test program at the
last moment...
That's a historical BSD-ism. They can't change it now, because
programs do trap and check for SIGBUS on that platform for protection
violations.
> I'll probably go file a bug with Apple now :-D
It might be a generic *BSD bug (for whatever value of * is used by MacOS X).
That would be interesting to know -- anyone here running *BSD on PPC
or any other architecture to test?
Of course it's an Apple bug as well :)
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-01 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-30 2:44 A question about PROT_NONE on ARM and ARM26 Jamie Lokier
2004-06-30 3:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-01 3:26 ` Testing PROT_NONE and other protections, and a surprise Jamie Lokier
2004-07-01 3:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-01 4:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-07-01 3:44 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-07-01 4:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-07-01 4:59 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-07-01 12:39 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2004-07-01 14:43 ` [OT] " Kyle Moffett
2004-07-01 14:50 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-07-01 15:01 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-07-01 16:37 ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-01 17:26 ` Michael Driscoll
2004-07-02 7:37 ` Gabriel Paubert
2004-07-01 12:52 ` Russell King
2004-07-01 14:26 ` Richard Curnow
2004-06-30 8:16 ` A question about PROT_NONE on ARM and ARM26 Russell King
2004-06-30 14:59 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-30 15:22 ` Ian Molton
2004-06-30 18:26 ` Russell King
2004-06-30 19:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-30 19:23 ` Russell King
2004-06-30 20:15 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-30 22:59 ` Russell King
2004-06-30 23:30 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-30 23:48 ` Ian Molton
2004-07-01 1:59 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-07-01 1:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-07-01 1:50 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-07-02 18:39 ` Russell King
2004-07-01 15:27 ` Scott Wood
2004-07-01 23:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-07-02 14:36 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040701123941.GC4187@mail.shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.kerrisk@gmx.net \
--cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.