From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266210AbUGASOX (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:14:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266216AbUGASOX (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:14:23 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:50360 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266210AbUGASOV (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:14:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:14:01 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Matt Mackall Cc: Paul Davis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK Message-ID: <20040701181401.GB21066@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Matt Mackall , Paul Davis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200406301341.i5UDfkKX010518@localhost.localdomain> <20040701180356.GI5414@waste.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040701180356.GI5414@waste.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:41:46AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: >> Because of the recognition by kernel developers that 2.6 does not >> perform as well as 2.4+lowlat (the Andrew Morton patches) when it >> comes to scheduling latency, most audio developers and users have >> remained with 2.4. Recently however, several brave souls have >> attempted to test 2.6. The results have been mixed. On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:03:56PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > I'm afraid these "brave souls" have shown up to the baby shower after > the child's been accepted to college. Developers getting around to > testing 2.6 after multiple vendors are shipping it should not be > characterized as courageous. I appear to have nuked the thread you're replying to in disgust over this precise issue. -- wli