From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264961AbUGBWlb (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 18:41:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264965AbUGBWlb (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 18:41:31 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:19116 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264961AbUGBWl3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 18:41:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:44:14 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6.7-mm5] perfctr low-level documentation Message-Id: <20040702154414.31fcfd40.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200407021919.i62JJh0J004586@harpo.it.uu.se> References: <200407021919.i62JJh0J004586@harpo.it.uu.se> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > I'm > considering Christoph Hellwig's suggestion of moving > the API back to /proc//, but with multiple files > and open/read/write/mmap instead of ioctl. I believe I > can make that work, but it would take a couple of days > to implement properly. Please indicate if you would like > this change or not. What would be the advantages of such a change?