From: Andrew Clausen <clausen@gnu.org>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: "Patrick J. LoPresti" <patl@users.sourceforge.net>,
Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu>,
Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl>,
Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Fehr <fehr@suse.de>,
bug-parted@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff)
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 22:44:35 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040703124435.GH630@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407030843400.2415@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> > In any case, I don't have any evidence that anything is wrong. On my
> > computer, I can tell the BIOS to use CHS geometry, (as opposed to
> > "Auto", "LBA" or "Large") modify the partition table to set the CHS
> > start/end of the Windows partition to 0, 1024, or anything I like, and
> > Windows STILL works. I can't get anything to break!
>
> Which version of Windows?
XP home edition (the green box)
> Does it use NTFS as both the boot and system drive?
I am using a single NTFS partition.
Note: I reversed-engineered the Windows FAT bootstrap code. My analysis
is contained in the file doc/FAT in the Parted source distribution. I
concluded that Windows uses LBA if the LBA flag is set in the boot
partition table entry. (i.e. the partition type includes LBA in the
fdisk codes - this corresponds to a bit being set)
> > So, can anyone break Windows?
>
> Easily. Modify any of the relevant values in the NTFS bootsector and
> windows will no longer boot. So it clearly cares hugely about the
> geometry. And at present there is no easy way for us to tell what it is
> so mkntfs and ntfsclone cannot create bootable partitions on 2.6 kernels.
> (Works fine on 2.4 using HDIO_GETGEO.)
>
> The relevant fields are (see linux/fs/ntfs/layout.h or
> ntfsprogs/include/ntfs/layout.h) in the NTFS_BOOT_SECTOR in the
> BIOS_PARAMETER_BLOCK:
>
> u16 sectors_per_track; /* Required to boot Windows. */
> u16 heads; /* Required to boot Windows. */
> u32 hidden_sectors; /* Offset to the start of the partition relative
> to the disk in sectors. Required to boot Windows. */
I just set the first 2 of these fields to 0, and everything still works.
Am I blessed? (Or perhaps cursed!)
Isn't hidden_sectors an LBA value (and hence irrelevant to this discussion)?
Cheers,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-03 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <s5gwu1mwpus.fsf@patl=users.sf.net>
2004-07-02 16:17 ` [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff) Szakacsits Szabolcs
2004-07-02 16:50 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-02 18:28 ` dwm
2004-07-02 21:12 ` parted maintainership Andries Brouwer
2004-07-02 17:04 ` [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff) Andries Brouwer
2004-07-02 18:12 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2004-07-02 18:45 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407022025200.28638@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
2004-07-02 19:57 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2004-07-03 0:17 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2004-07-03 0:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-07-03 0:56 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-03 1:57 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2004-07-03 13:59 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2004-07-05 12:14 ` Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics for 2.6 (was: Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics) Szakacsits Szabolcs
2004-07-05 13:10 ` Steffen Winterfeldt
2004-07-05 13:12 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-05 13:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-07-05 14:00 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-05 19:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-07-05 21:08 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-05 21:52 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-07-06 0:17 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2004-07-06 1:56 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-06 18:56 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2004-07-07 1:28 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-07 11:14 ` Roman Zippel
2004-07-07 11:51 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2004-07-06 8:33 ` Steffen Winterfeldt
2004-07-05 18:09 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2004-07-05 18:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-07-03 3:00 ` [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff) Andrew Clausen
2004-07-02 23:55 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2004-07-03 13:56 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2004-07-03 2:54 ` Andrew Clausen
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407030843400.2415@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
2004-07-03 12:44 ` Andrew Clausen [this message]
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407031535230.6149@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
2004-07-03 15:02 ` Andrew Clausen
2004-07-03 14:42 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2004-07-03 1:35 ` Andrew Clausen
2004-07-03 12:33 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-03 14:15 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2004-07-03 14:45 ` Andrew Clausen
2004-07-03 15:00 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2004-07-03 20:12 ` Andries Brouwer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040703124435.GH630@gnu.org \
--to=clausen@gnu.org \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=bug-parted@gnu.org \
--cc=fehr@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patl@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=snwint@suse.de \
--cc=szaka@sienet.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.