From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: xen@mikebell.org Subject: Re: Re: almost working Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:37:26 +0900 Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20040704123725.GS748@tinyvaio.nome.ca> References: <1A128452-AD4C-455D-B19C-BD57C94FFE17@mimectl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1A128452-AD4C-455D-B19C-BD57C94FFE17@mimectl> Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: James Harper Cc: Ian Pratt , Keir Fraser , "xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 08:24:54PM +1000, James Harper wrote: > If devfs is indeed disappearing in 2.6 then there's probably not a lot of point adding support for it. Debian can use it, but I don't think it's enabled by default. I like the way devfs works but obviously most people don't. Just a note, I believe Andrew Morton confirmed that devfs definitely won't be disappearing in 2.6. The earliest it would be removed is 2.7, and even that's not certain. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com