All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: FabF <fabian.frederick@skynet.be>
Cc: ak@muc.de, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: procfs permissions on 2.6.x
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 16:30:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040704163012.5dd9b971.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1088980642.2429.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>

> if mods are accurately defined from the beginning

Is there a single "accurate" definition (of /proc file permissions)
on which we agree?  I suspect not.

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-04 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2dZjc-7BP-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <2dZjf-7BP-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <2dZsQ-7GF-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <2dZVV-867-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <2e0oZ-8lm-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <2emSs-6R8-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <2enbS-72q-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]             ` <2env9-7li-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-07-04 22:25               ` procfs permissions on 2.6.x Andi Kleen
2004-07-04 22:37                 ` FabF
2004-07-04 23:30                   ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2004-07-03 20:22 Herbert Poetzl
2004-07-03 20:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-03 20:35   ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-03 21:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-03 21:35       ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-04 21:35         ` viro
2004-07-04 21:55           ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-04 22:13             ` viro
2004-07-04 22:43               ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06  3:31                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-07-05  1:50               ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-05  1:55                 ` viro
2004-07-05  8:05                 ` Duncan Sands
2004-07-05  8:14                   ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-04  1:27     ` bert hubert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040704163012.5dd9b971.pj@sgi.com \
    --to=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=fabian.frederick@skynet.be \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.