From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9?= Eychenne <rv@wallfire.org>
Subject: modified iptables manpage
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:57:40 +0200
Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <20040705115740.GD21294@eychenne.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Netfilter Development <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org>
To: "Laurence J. Lane" <ljlane@debian.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/>
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

 Hi,

I saw that the last iptables Debian package version (1.2.9-10) includes
patches to iptables, in particular to the original manpage. Did I miss
your requests in order to make these changes in the upstream manpage?
The nature of the patches doesn't matter (they are small)... but don't
you think that the fair way to do things is to forward wishes to upstream=
,
so that everyone could benefit from the improvements, instead of keeping
them for Debian users only?

Note: I'll submit a patch to the manpage (with other small changes as wel=
l)
during the week.

 Herve

--=20
 _
(=B0=3D  Herv=E9 Eychenne
//)  Homepage:          http://www.eychenne.org/
v_/_ WallFire project:  http://www.wallfire.org/