From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: jamie@shareable.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix tcp_default_win_scale.
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:35:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040706133559.70b6380d.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040706133641.4a58af30@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:36:41 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> wrote:
> > Ok, this is a possibility. And why it breaks is that if the ACK
> > for the SYN+ACK comes back, the SYN+ACK sender can only assume
> > that the window scale was accepted.
> >
> > Stephen, do you have a trace showing exactly this?
>
> No, I don't have a br0ken firewall here. I can get out fine.
> When I setup with same kernel as packages.gentoo.org, it works fine as well.
Therefore we do not know which of the following two it really is:
1) window scale option being stripped from SYN+ACK
2) non-zero window option being patched into a zero window
scale option
The trace Bert Hubert will get with Alessandro will give us the
information we need.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-06 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <32886.63.170.215.71.1088564087.squirrel@www.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20040629222751.392f0a82.davem@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20040630152750.2d01ca51@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
[not found] ` <20040630153049.3ca25b76.davem@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20040701133738.301b9e46@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
[not found] ` <20040701140406.62dfbc2a.davem@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20040702013225.GA24707@conectiva.com.br>
[not found] ` <20040706093503.GA8147@outpost.ds9a.nl>
2004-07-06 18:47 ` [PATCH] fix tcp_default_win_scale Stephen Hemminger
2004-07-06 18:58 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-07-06 20:17 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-06 20:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-07-06 20:33 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-06 19:40 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-07-06 20:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-07-06 20:28 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-06 20:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-07-06 20:35 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-07-06 21:55 ` John Heffner
2004-07-06 22:50 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-07 1:32 ` John Heffner
2004-07-06 23:01 ` PLS help fix: recent 2.6.7 won't connect to anything " bert hubert
2004-07-06 20:12 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-06 22:44 ` bert hubert
2004-07-06 22:49 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-07 18:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-07-07 19:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-07-07 19:38 ` bert hubert
2004-07-07 19:41 ` John Heffner
2004-07-09 23:14 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-06 20:00 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-07-06 20:16 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-06 20:26 ` David Ford
2004-07-06 20:24 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-06 23:16 ` Andi Kleen
2004-07-07 7:50 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-06 23:19 ` Redeeman
2004-07-06 23:25 ` bert hubert
2004-07-07 5:39 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 6:05 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 19:47 ` John Heffner
2004-07-06 20:35 Tim Berti
2004-07-06 20:54 ` David Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040706133559.70b6380d.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.