From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264788AbUGGBMZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 21:12:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264791AbUGGBMZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 21:12:25 -0400 Received: from LPBPRODUCTIONS.COM ([68.98.211.131]:13755 "HELO lpbproductions.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264788AbUGGBMW (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 21:12:22 -0400 From: Matt Heler Reply-To: lkml@lpbproduction.scom To: Redeeman Subject: Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:12:23 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.82 Cc: Horst von Brand , LKML Mailinglist References: <200407061930.i66JUpqI009671@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> <1089160973.903.1.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1089160973.903.1.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407061812.24526.lkml@lpbproductions.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Not to sound mean about this. But either you prove your claim with benchmarks in a controlled enviroment ( that means in a private network ), or you stop trolling and complaining. The linux kernel is a free piece of software, if you don't like one version of it, then feel free to use some earlier version. Otherwise please stop. Matt H. On Tuesday 06 July 2004 5:42 pm, Redeeman wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 15:30 -0400, Horst von Brand wrote: > > Redeeman said: > > > On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 17:54 -0700, Matt Heler wrote: > > > > Ok first take benchmarks ( use wget ), and secondly results from the > > > > internet vary day by day , hour to hour , minute by minute. Don't > > > > expect all sites on the internet to be the same speed, or even stay > > > > the same speed for that matter. For more accurate benchmark results > > > > setup a personal server on your own private network and benchmark > > > > http trasnfers using different kernels. > > > > > > i am aware of this, however, what i use to benchmark is kernel.org, as > > > i can see they have alot bandwith free. > > > > How do you know that? > > how i know? i dont think anyone in the matter of seconds begin to use > the spare ~800mbit/s of bandwith they do not use when i try, (according > to info from bwbar on kernel.org) > > > > if i use kernel.org http i get 50kb/s, if i use ftp, i can easily fetch > > > with 200kb/s > > > > Trafic shaping somewhere along the route? Much more load on HTTP than > > FTP? Are they the very same machines? Under the exact same load? Are the > > servers written with the same care? Are the clients? > > > > > also, the gnu ftp, where i took gcc3.4.1, it gave me 200kb/s > > > > Ditto. > > > > Unless you set up something where there aren't dozens of unknown > > variables and a hundred or so that you have got no chance at all to even > > guess what their values/effects are... > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/