From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i66JF4024077 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:15:04 -0400 Received: from polop.usc.edu (polop.usc.edu [128.125.10.9]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i66JF3e1013803 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:15:03 -0400 Received: from polop.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by polop.usc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i66JF3O6004582 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:15:03 -0700 Received: (from garrick@localhost) by polop.usc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i66JF3U9004580 for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:15:03 -0700 Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:15:03 -0700 From: Garrick Staples Message-ID: <20040706191502.GL11597@polop.usc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KE2MUCIIiXMogsnv" Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [linux-lvm] dm kernel patch size Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: linux-lvm@redhat.com --KE2MUCIIiXMogsnv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can someone comment on the size of the dm kernel patches? They seem to be = far too large and patch far more than just dm. It appears that they patch betw= een different kernel versions. --=20 Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator University of Southern California --KE2MUCIIiXMogsnv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA6vo20SBUxJbm9HMRArwUAKDFyyr9QIJ7m4NihDLjQZnevbN1wACcDdp5 qt8vGLD0SsMsQBR7jpeJmhU= =7SI+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KE2MUCIIiXMogsnv--