From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@sterenborg.info>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: Qustion wrt state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 07:11:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040707051150.381201787@sterenborg.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <opsaq0vou24evsfm@smtp.pacific.net.th>
> Is my assumtion correct that state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> checks all flags
> for match and thus this state can (and should be for
> performance reasons)
> be the first in each table ?
No, it checks the *state*.
The first packet that is seen in a connection has state NEW, the rest
have state ESTABLISHED or RELATED (as with e.g. ftp). Since these
packets are let's say 99% in a connection, the ESTABLISHED and RELATED
match will match the most packets. Also see the byte/packet counters for
this (first 2 columns in the list below).
That's why you probably want that rule somewhere on top for performance
reasons because the rules are traversed in the order they are entered,
and therefore matched in the order they are entered.
> Chain INPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
> destination
> 15172 2029K ACCEPT all -- any any anywhere
> anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
Rule 1 (state checking)
> 0 0 BADTCP tcp -- any any
> anywhere anywhere tcp
> flags:FIN,SYN,RST,PSH,ACK,URG/FIN,PSH,URG
Rule 2 (flag checking)
So you have 2 separate rules ; 1 for state and 1 for flag checking.
Gr,
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-07 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-07 3:48 Qustion wrt state RELATED,ESTABLISHED Michael Frank
2004-07-07 5:11 ` Rob Sterenborg [this message]
2004-07-07 6:13 ` Michael Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040707051150.381201787@sterenborg.info \
--to=rob@sterenborg.info \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.