From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264936AbUGGHbE (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 03:31:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264937AbUGGHbE (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 03:31:04 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:28585 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264936AbUGGHbC (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 03:31:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:30:59 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: Ray Lee Cc: tomstdenis@yahoo.com, eger@havoc.gtf.org, Linux Kernel Subject: Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL Message-ID: <20040707073059.GA20079@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <1089165901.4373.175.camel@orca.madrabbit.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1089165901.4373.175.camel@orca.madrabbit.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Jul-06 2004, Tue, 19:05 -0700 Ray Lee wrote: > According to K&R, 2nd ed, section A2.5.1 (Integer Constants): > > The type of an integer depends on its form, value and suffix. > [...] If it is unsuffixed octal or hexadecimal, it has the first > possible of these types ["in which its value can be represented" > -- from omitted]: int, unsigned int, long int, unsigned long > int. Is it safe to assume that C99 compilers append "..., long long int, unsigned long long int" to the list? -- Tomas Szepe