From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Samad Subject: MARK-Operations problems Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 21:57:53 +1000 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040707115753.GA22265@samad.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Cc: Fabrice MARIE Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi I seem to be having some problem with the MARK-operations patch from pom-ng. I have applied a few patches together on a debian 2.6.7 nf_reset policy MARK-operations REJECT proc-no-internal-targets init_conntrack-optimize ipt_helper-invert-fix nf-l= og connlimit dstlimit mport nth raw TARPIT CLASSIFY CLASSIFY_more-hooks comment dstlimit=20 iprange dropped-table pool osf I build a static linked iptables for testing but when I attempt to run this command=20 iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING 1 -j MARK --or-mark 0x1 I get iptables: Target problem and this is dmesg MARK: targinfosize 8 !=3D 4 interesting is when i run this command against the static link iptables iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING 1 -j MARK --set-mark 0x1 I get the same error, but it works okay when I use the orginial (unpatch iptables command) any suggestions on how to track down the error or where might be the best place to look Thanks Alex --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA6+VBkZz88chpJ2MRArDQAKCxQ04blNU+EU43wtfi3fBLkg4NuACgwtla c9Ha+1rtrm5sO8m6S89Uwt8= =35SZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--