From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Samad Subject: Re: MARK-Operations problems Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 12:18:02 +1000 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040708021802.GL6161@samad.com.au> References: <20040707115753.GA22265@samad.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YQEH9CATo+4lan7A" Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --YQEH9CATo+4lan7A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 02:10:40AM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Alexander Samad wrote: >=20 > > I build a static linked iptables for testing but when I attempt to run > > this command=20 > >=20 > > iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING 1 -j MARK --or-mark 0x1 > > I get iptables: Target problem > > and this is dmesg MARK: targinfosize 8 !=3D 4 >=20 > Looks to me like you are running a patched iptables userspace command on > an unpatched kernel... Double checked this and I am pretty sure its pacthed all the right modules are there (the ones that are created with the patch), the strange bit is even a working command -j MARK --set-mark 0x01 fails with the same error, but the unpatched iptables doesn't on the same patches kernel >=20 > Regards > Henrik >=20 >=20 --YQEH9CATo+4lan7A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA7K7akZz88chpJ2MRAsqQAKCh7ckGB4nFJAWMnsnr/AyVcKQQyACeO/Qe ZLpUSMZ7oLgeVz3YnqLnlIo= =PQcD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YQEH9CATo+4lan7A--