From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alpt Subject: Re: Different routes for different src addresses Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:52:56 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040708055256.GA31304@nihil> References: <20040707120502.GA23120@nihil> <200407071410.02752.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> <200407072236.32644.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407072236.32644.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:36:32PM +0100, Antony Stone after a spiritual ca= ll wrote : ~> > This is true, but misleading. Netfilter does provide a nice interface= to ~> > iproute2 with the fwmark feature. ~>=20 ~> This is true, but unnecessary :) Btw, It's always better to know more (^_+) ~> If all you want to match on is source IP (which is what the original pos= ter=20 ~> asked about), then iproute2 can do it quite neatly on its own. ~>=20 ~> Mixing netfilter MARKs and iproute2 tables is a neat solution to some=20 ~> problems, but not required for the simple ones. In the end, Thanks to all for your replies. Best Regards --=20 :wq! "I don't know nothing" The One Who reached the Thinking Matter '.' [ Alpt --- Freaknet Medialab ] [ GPG Key ID 441CF0EE ] [ Key fingerprint =3D 8B02 26E8 831A 7BB9 81A9 5277 BFF8 037E 441C F0EE ] --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA7OE4v/gDfkQc8O4RAtIlAKCgbPIu0OMh/HZkhnA7QEE6ntGGkgCgloU1 ltE4/BiMLX3yKIx45yIs2qg= =jNF4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--