From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264129AbUGHPZF (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:25:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264154AbUGHPZF (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:25:05 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:55012 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264129AbUGHPZC (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:25:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 10:24:25 -0500 From: linas@austin.ibm.com To: Greg KH Cc: Linda Xie , linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 PCI Hotplug: receive PPC64 EEH events Message-ID: <20040708102425.L21634@forte.austin.ibm.com> References: <20040707155907.G21634@forte.austin.ibm.com> <40EC9A02.1000507@us.ibm.com> <20040707190642.J21634@forte.austin.ibm.com> <20040708060933.GE548@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040708060933.GE548@kroah.com>; from greg@kroah.com on Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:09:33PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:09:33PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > pci_scan_child_bus() is currently ... > > It's in the latest -bk tree, right? yes, it looks correct in the current tree (it wasn't when I'd previously cloned). It's possible I'm not using bk correctly; once I've modified a file, 'bk pull' never merges in newer changes made upstream. So I have to 'bk clone' all the time, which is a pain in the neck. What am I doing wrong? --linas