From: "Daniel F. Chief Security Engineer -" <danielf@supportteam.net>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Is Linux based Gateway/Firewall feasible
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 19:38:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407081938.09690.danielf@supportteam.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40ED39B9.30608@svw.com>
In my experience I would use a router and a firewall as separate devices. I
use Juniper routers and Linux firewalls. My network pushes about 800Mbs at
peak, we have over 4000 servers. And I have found using linux firewalls as
the gateway and then having the router in front to handle all of the WAN
connections works out best.
hope this helps.
On Thursday 08 July 2004 07:10, Sudheer Divakaran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I'm using a machine
> with Linux + IPTables as the gateway machine which inturn connects to
> two different ISPs. My question is can a Linux based machine match the
> performance of a hardware based routers provided by Cisco,... OR is my
> decision to go for a Linux based solution is a wrong one?.
>
> Is there so much difference between these two solutions?
>
> Can I achieve the same performance using a high end PC and Linux?
>
> I'm asking this because one guy told me that my decision to go for a
> Linux based solution is a wrong one and it can never match the
> performance of hardware based Routers.
>
> Thanks
> Sudheer
--
"Unix IS user-friendly. It's just picky about who its friends are."
_,.-:*"``'*:-.,_,.-:*"``'*:-.,_,.-:*"``'*:-.,_,.-:*"``'*:-.,_,.-:*"``'*:-.,_
Daniel Fairchild - Chief Security Officer | danielf@supportteam.net
C I Host. 1851 Central Drive Suite 110. Bedford, TX 76021
T. 888.868.9931 ext 7103
F. 888.241.2294
http://www.cihost.com
-------------------------------------------
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-09 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-08 12:10 Is Linux based Gateway/Firewall feasible Sudheer Divakaran
2004-07-08 12:55 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-08 14:05 ` Marco Colombo
2004-07-08 14:30 ` Sudheer Divakaran
2004-07-09 7:46 ` Cedric Blancher
2004-07-09 12:35 ` Marco Colombo
2004-07-08 14:43 ` Cedric Blancher
2004-07-09 0:38 ` Daniel F. Chief Security Engineer - [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-08 13:21 Mike O
2004-07-08 13:38 ` Antony Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407081938.09690.danielf@supportteam.net \
--to=danielf@supportteam.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.