From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265002AbUGHUvT (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:51:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265007AbUGHUvT (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:51:19 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:20424 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265002AbUGHUvQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:51:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 22:48:40 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Christoph Hellwig , Erik Rigtorp , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp bootsplash support Message-ID: <20040708204840.GB607@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <20040708110549.GB9919@linux.nu> <20040708133934.GA10997@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040708133934.GA10997@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > This patch adds support for bootsplash to swsusp. The code interfacing to > > bootsplash needs some more work, currently it's more or less ripped from > > swsusp2. Some more code could probably be moved into console.c instead. > > CONFIG_BOOTSPALSH (foruntatley) isn't in mainline, so while you're of course > free to keep this patch around it has no business at all in mainline. The patch was not intended for mainline... But it will be usefull anyway as big distros want this kind of stuff.... Perhaps CONFIG_BOOTSPLASH should be in mainline after all? I really don't want to see 2 different incompatible sets of hooks into swsusp.... Pavel -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms