From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264160AbUGHVEI (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:04:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265074AbUGHVEI (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:04:08 -0400 Received: from [213.146.154.40] ([213.146.154.40]:33185 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264160AbUGHVEH (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:04:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 22:04:03 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Pavel Machek Cc: Erik Rigtorp , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp bootsplash support Message-ID: <20040708210403.GA18049@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Pavel Machek , Erik Rigtorp , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz References: <20040708110549.GB9919@linux.nu> <20040708133934.GA10997@infradead.org> <20040708204840.GB607@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040708204840.GB607@openzaurus.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Perhaps CONFIG_BOOTSPLASH should be in mainline after all? > I really don't want to see 2 different incompatible sets > of hooks into swsusp.... No. This stuff has no business in the kernel, paint your fancy graphics ontop of fbdev. And the SuSE bootsplash patch is utter crap, I mean what do you have to smoke to put a jpeg decoder into the kernel?