From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zombie.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i69BCKrT018548 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 07:12:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.sws.net.au (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by zombie.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i69BCGNR002272 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 11:12:18 GMT From: Russell Coker Reply-To: russell@coker.com.au To: Bradley Chapman Subject: Re: An SELinux policy for Red Hat 9 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 21:11:55 +1000 Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200407092111.55045.russell@coker.com.au> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 06:17, Bradley Chapman wrote: > Does anyone know of a good place where I can start reading about how > to adapt, or obtain, an SELinux policy for Red Hat 9, running the > 2.6.7 kernel with the SELinux userspace package dated 20040628-16? Why would you want to do that? Consider Fedora Core 1 as RHL 10, and FC2 as RHL 11 an just upgrade a couple of versions to get SE Linux support. But if you REALLY want to use RHL 9, the current policy should work OK, you just have to make the appropriate changes to pam, logrotate, cron, coreutils, etc. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.