On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:50:17AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> the other bad thing is that there is no  point for the sysctl (in 2.4
> that made no sense at all too, yeah it only makes sense for benchmarking
> easily w/ and w/o the feature but it must be optimized away at the very
> least with a config option for production), 

as Ingo wrote, that is the plan, all that "crud" is there just to make it
easy to benchmark for now.