All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [netfilter-core] strict rejection of init -> core references causes problems
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 07:15:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040710071532.GH5173@sunbeam2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16622.17154.117052.31601@napali.hpl.hp.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1429 bytes --]

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:19:46PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >So what really happens is: calls from init to 'core' functions 
> >and calls from 'exit' to core functions.
> 
> Hmmm.  Neither of those should have tripped the check in the
> kernel module loader.  It should only go bang when you have a
> call from "core" to "init".  Does "exit" end up in a separate
> section?  Maybe I was mistakenly triggering on the exit->core?

Apparently yes:

  0 .text         00003f78  00000000  00000000  00000034  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, CODE
  1 .init.text    0000029c  00000000  00000000  00003fac  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, CODE
  2 .exit.text    00000008  00000000  00000000  00004248  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, CODE

But also, we don't call __init from __exit (which would be crash once
__init has been purged from memory).  

> Which module actually failed to load?

yes, I would be interested in that, too :)

> -Tony

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-07-10  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-09  7:02 strict rejection of init -> core references causes problems David Mosberger
2004-07-09  8:01 ` [netfilter-core] " Harald Welte
2004-07-09 15:59 ` Luck, Tony
2004-07-09 18:36 ` [netfilter-core] " David Mosberger
2004-07-09 18:46 ` Luck, Tony
2004-07-09 18:52 ` [netfilter-core] " Harald Welte
2004-07-09 19:19 ` Luck, Tony
2004-07-10  7:15 ` Harald Welte [this message]
2004-07-12 14:36 ` [netfilter-core] strict rejection of init -> core references Jean-Marc Saffroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040710071532.GH5173@sunbeam2 \
    --to=laforge@netfilter.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.