From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266453AbUGJWPc (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:15:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266454AbUGJWPc (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:15:32 -0400 Received: from pirx.hexapodia.org ([65.103.12.242]:42314 "EHLO pirx.hexapodia.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266453AbUGJWPa (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:15:30 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:15:29 -0500 From: Andy Isaacson To: carbonated beverage Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bk pull from bkbits screwy? Message-ID: <20040710221529.GA12455@hexapodia.org> References: <20040710065802.GA29604@net-ronin.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040710065802.GA29604@net-ronin.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 48 01 21 E2 D4 E4 68 D1 B8 DF 39 B2 AF A3 16 B9 X-PGP-Key-URL: http://web.hexapodia.org/~adi/pgp.txt X-Domestic-Surveillance: money launder bomb tax evasion Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:58:02PM -0700, carbonated beverage wrote: > I sent a patch a while ago to change the bk:// to http:// in the docs, > but was told bk:// was working again. Just did a bk pull again right now, > and bk:// doesn't seem to be working, whereas reparenting my repo to http:// > and doing a bk pull works. Am I missing something? How about giving the command that didn't work, and the error messages it printed? I just did a pull using bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 and it succeeded: ... takepatch: 25577 new revisions, 0 conflicts in 6840 files 8439936 bytes uncompressed to 36145013, 4.28X expansion Running resolve to apply new work ... Using :0.0 as graphical display resolve: found 491 renames in pass 1 resolve: resolved 491 renames in pass 2 resolve: applied 6840 files in pass 4 resolve: running consistency check, please wait... 100% |=================================================================| OK Consistency check passed, resolve complete. straum% bk pull Pull bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 -> file://data/linux/linux-2.5 Nothing to pull. straum% There are two different URL syntaxes that start "bk://" and perhaps you're using the wrong one. (I got caught by that one a while back.) And yes, bk:// is preferred over http://, in general. -andy