From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: binutils woes
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:32:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040711123217.C13616@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040701175231.B8389@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk on Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 05:52:31PM +0100
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 05:52:31PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> I think the only way we can ensure kernel correctness is to add a
> subsequent stage to kbuild such that whenever we generate a final
> program, we grep the 'nm' output for undefined symbols.
...
BTW, binutils 2.15 on ARM has other issues, which I've reported to
Nick Clifton/binutils-bug. The assembler seems to produce extra
symbolic information in the form of symbols starting with '$', eg:
c0067860 T __fput
c0067860 t $a
c0067954 t $d
c0067958 T fget
c0067958 t $a
Not only do these symbols interfere with ld's error reporting, but
they also interfere with kallsyms - the backtrace information from
such a kernel is not very useful when it reports function names of
'$a':
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x6042c): In function `$a':
: relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 .exit.text
Obviously not useful to anyone.
This seems to only affect binutils 2.15, so I think we should hang
fire on any work-arounds until the binutils folk have commented.
--
Russell King
... who dearly wishes that the kernel build was still compatible
with the good old stable binutils 2.11 versions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-11 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-01 16:52 binutils woes Russell King
2004-07-01 17:47 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-01 18:07 ` Russell King
2004-07-01 19:44 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-07-01 19:52 ` Russell King
2004-07-01 22:12 ` Russell King
2004-07-01 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-01 22:22 ` Russell King
2004-07-02 10:56 ` Michael Buesch
2004-07-11 11:32 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-07-11 13:56 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040711123217.C13616@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.