From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Kevin Corry <kevcorry@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim.houston@comcast.net,
dm-devel@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, agk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1/1: Device-Mapper: Remove 1024 devices limitation
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:14:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040712111445.374bf579.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407120949.03928.kevcorry@us.ibm.com>
Kevin Corry <kevcorry@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 07 July 2004 6:10 am, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Jim Houston <jim.houston@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > It's not quite right. If you want to keep a count in the upper bits
> > > you have to mask off that count before checking if the id is beyond the
> > > end of the allocated space.
> >
> > OK, I'll fix that up.
> >
> > But I don't want to keep a count in the upper bits! I want rid of that
> > stuff altogether, completely, all of it. It just keeps on hanging around
> > :(
> >
> > We should remove MAX_ID_* from the kernel altogether.
>
> Just following up on the proposed IDR changes. Based on the patches in the
> latest -mm tree, I'm assuming there is or will be a fix for IDR so it will
> always return NULL when asked to find an id that's not currently allocated.
> Is this correct? If so, I can drop the second "dm-use-idr" patch (from July
> 6, 2004) and keep the one that's currently in -mm.
>
Yes, I'm assuming that the code in Linus's tree at present is acceptable,
and I'll take another look at the idr code post-2.6.8.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-12 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-01 15:35 [PATCH] 1/1: Device-Mapper: Remove 1024 devices limitation Kevin Corry
2004-07-01 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-02 2:54 ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-02 3:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-02 17:33 ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-02 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 18:23 ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-06 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 21:35 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2004-07-06 22:04 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2004-07-06 22:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 22:07 ` Jim Houston
2004-07-06 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 23:00 ` Jim Houston
2004-07-06 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-07 10:58 ` Jim Houston
2004-07-07 11:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-12 14:49 ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-12 18:14 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040712111445.374bf579.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jim.houston@comcast.net \
--cc=kevcorry@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.