All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sander Nagtegaal <trunks-carracho@planet.nl>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X,  QEMU vs Virual PC
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:59:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407121259.50135.trunks-carracho@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40EF7375.4090002@aol.com>

Are you talking about pseudo little-endian mode on a G3/G4? Make no mistakes 
that would speed up the emulation by about 30/50% ( Atleast it did on Virtual 
PC )
I've been asking about this before but got no replies from here at all.
Also..........since QEMU-fast only works on a modified Linux kernel and makes 
QEMU about 50% faster ( atleast that's what the website says ) is there a way 
to make QEMU-fast work on WINDOWS/95/98/2000/NT/XP to? I suppose Virtual PC 
does this somehow. No idea how though..........

Op zaterdag 10 juli 2004 6:41 am, schreef Fred Hope:
>  >> I think that including support for the PowerPC swapping instructions
>
> in QEMU
>
>  >> will break compatibility with host PowerPCs before G3, so that
>
> instructions
>
>  >> should be used in a run-time capability detection scheme.
>  >
>  >It also dosen't work on the 970 (G5) - one of my friends has been
>  >waiting for QEMU for OS X for that reason ;)
>
> About breaking support for PowerPCs before G3, I wouldn't think that
> matters, since OS X only runs on G3 and later unless you use a special
> hack or something.
>
> But if it doesn't work on the G5, then yeah hopefully it can be
> controlled at runtime and still let G3/G4 users have this stuff.
>
> Anyone care to explain to me what this stuff we're talking about
> actually does?  :) Sorry but I dunno much about processor instructions
> and stuff.  I assume it would make QEMU faster...would it make any
> substantial difference, or add any other features?
>
> Fred Hope
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-12 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-10  4:41 [Qemu-devel] Re: Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virual PC Fred Hope
2004-07-12 10:59 ` Sander Nagtegaal [this message]
2004-07-12 16:33   ` John R. Hogerhuis
2004-07-12 16:44     ` [Qemu-devel] Re: Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, =?iso-8859-1?q? QEMU=20vs=20Virual?= PC Colin Watson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-12 19:30 [Qemu-devel] Re: Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virual PC Natalia Portillo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200407121259.50135.trunks-carracho@planet.nl \
    --to=trunks-carracho@planet.nl \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.