From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David Dabbs" <david@dabbs.net>
Subject: RE: Performance improvements to key comparison functions
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:49:25 -0500
Message-ID: <20040712204952.C0C3A1617F@mail03.powweb.com>
References: <16626.61112.905268.684688@laputa.namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-19584-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <16626.61112.905268.684688@laputa.namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: 'Nikita Danilov' <Nikita@Clusterfs.COM>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com



> Nikita Danilov wrote
> That said, I think that proper way to test your functions is to plug
> them into kernel reiser4 version and run some CPU intensive tests.

Is bonnie++ the recommended stress tool, or is there a reiser4 stress
utility?


David