From: Gabriel Devenyi <devenyga@mcmaster.ca>
To: ck@vds.kolivas.org
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: Preempt Threshold Measurements
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:48:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407122248.50377.devenyga@mcmaster.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040713024051.GQ21066@holomorphy.com>
Well I'm not particularly educated in kernel internals yet, here's some
reports from the system when its running.
6ms non-preemptible critical section violated 4 ms preempt threshold starting
at do_munmap+0xd2/0x140 and ending at do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c014007b>] do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c01163b0>] dec_preempt_count+0x110/0x120
[<c014007b>] do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c014010f>] sys_munmap+0x3f/0x60
[<c0103ee1>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71
6ms non-preemptible critical section violated 4 ms preempt threshold starting
at do_munmap+0xd2/0x140 and ending at do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c014007b>] do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c01163b0>] dec_preempt_count+0x110/0x120
[<c014007b>] do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c014010f>] sys_munmap+0x3f/0x60
[<c0103ee1>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71
6ms non-preemptible critical section violated 4 ms preempt threshold starting
at do_munmap+0xd2/0x140 and ending at do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c014007b>] do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c01163b0>] dec_preempt_count+0x110/0x120
[<c014007b>] do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c014010f>] sys_munmap+0x3f/0x60
[<c0103ee1>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71
5ms non-preemptible critical section violated 4 ms preempt threshold starting
at do_munmap+0xd2/0x140 and ending at do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c014007b>] do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c01163b0>] dec_preempt_count+0x110/0x120
[<c014007b>] do_munmap+0xeb/0x140
[<c014010f>] sys_munmap+0x3f/0x60
[<c0103ee1>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71
--
Gabriel Devenyi
devenyga@mcmaster.ca
On Monday 12 July 2004 22:40, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 07:43:25PM -0400, Gabriel Devenyi wrote:
> > Keeping in mind that I'm using the nvidia-kernel drivers, here are my
> > preempt threshold violations.
> > 6ms non-preemptible critical section violated 4 ms preempt threshold
> > starting at kernel_fpu_begin+0xd/0x50 and ending at
> > _mmx_memcpy+0x127/0x170 [<c0241987>] _mmx_memcpy+0x127/0x170
> > [<c01163b0>] dec_preempt_count+0x110/0x120
> > [<c0241987>] _mmx_memcpy+0x127/0x170
> > [<c012d3b5>] load_module+0x835/0x900
> > [<c013c84e>] unmap_vmas+0x10e/0x1f0
> > [<c012d4fb>] sys_init_module+0x7b/0x230
> > [<c0103ee1>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71
>
> Things tend to be slow and stupid in the interest of robustness during
> system initialization.
>
> I'd suggest ignoring those unless you're specifically interested in boot
> time (in which case you should be doing things for yourself) and focusing
> on ones reported during normal usage after the system is up.
>
>
> -- wli
> _______________________________________________
> ck@vds.kolivas.org
> ck mailing list - unmoderated. Please reply-to-all when posting.
> http://bhhdoa.org.au/mailman/listinfo/ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-13 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-12 23:43 Preempt Threshold Measurements Gabriel Devenyi
2004-07-12 23:59 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-13 0:15 ` Gabriel Devenyi
2004-07-13 2:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-13 2:48 ` Gabriel Devenyi [this message]
2004-07-13 2:54 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-13 4:01 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-13 5:51 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-13 6:14 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-13 8:03 ` Lee Revell
2004-07-13 10:26 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-13 21:52 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-13 10:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-13 10:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-13 11:07 ` Lenar Lõhmus
2004-07-13 11:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-13 2:55 ` [ck] " William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-13 3:09 ` Gabriel Devenyi
2004-07-13 4:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-13 5:34 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-13 5:48 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-13 10:14 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-14 10:15 ` [ck] " Jens Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407122248.50377.devenyga@mcmaster.ca \
--to=devenyga@mcmaster.ca \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.