From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Gaydenko Subject: Re: build error in pcm_native.c Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:42:08 +0400 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200407161742.08527@goldspace.net> References: <200407161357.56902@goldspace.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Takashi Iwai List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Takashi, Drivers were build successfully. Thanks! Andrew ======= On Friday 16 July 2004 17:15, you wrote: ======= At Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:08:14 +0200, I wrote: > > At Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:57:23 +0400, > Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > > > > clean/(re)cvscompile were done. > > > > I'm not bash guru, but from common view some configure fragment seems > > strange to me. I have got > > > > checking for new remap_page_range... "no" > > You have an old version of kernel, don't you? > > > Here 1 is assigned to new_remap (line 2). But CONFIG_OLD_REMAP_PAGE_RANGE > > is defined (line 8) only when new_remap equals 0 (line 6). Must new_remap > > assignement be reverted? > > It defines CONFIG_ *OLD* _REMAP_PAGE_RANGE. So it's correct. Doh, I found you're right, the 1 and 0 are reverted. And another silly typo. The corrected (additional) patch is below. Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click