From: Keshavamurthy Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
"Matthew C. Dobson [imap]" <colpatch@us.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched domains bringup race?
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:45:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040718134559.A25488@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1089944026.32312.47.camel@nighthawk>; from haveblue@us.ibm.com on Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:13:46PM -0700
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:13:46PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I keep getting oopses for the non-boot CPU in find_busiest_group().
> This occurs the first time that the CPU goes idle. Those groups are set
> up in sched_init_smp(), which is called after smp_init():
>
> static int init(void * unused)
> {
> ...
> fixup_cpu_present_map();
> smp_init();
> sched_init_smp();
>
> But, the idle threads for the secondary CPUs are initialized in
> smp_init(). So, what happens when a CPU tries to schedule (using sched
> domains) before sched_init_smp() completes? I think it goes boom! :)
>
> Anyway, I was thinking that we should just hold the runqueue lock on the
> non-boot CPUs until the sched domain init code is done. Does that sound
> feasible?
Even on my system which is Intel 865 chipset (P4 with HT enabled system)
I see a bug check somewhere in the schedular_tick during boot.
However if I move the sched_init_smp() after do_basic_setup() the
kernel boots without any problem. Any clue here?
static int init(void * unused)
{
...
fixup_cpu_present_map();
smp_init();
populate_rootfs();
do_basic_setup();
sched_init_smp();
-Anil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-18 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-16 2:13 sched domains bringup race? Dave Hansen
2004-07-16 3:03 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-16 3:30 ` Dave Hansen
2004-07-16 3:46 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-16 5:27 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-18 20:45 ` Keshavamurthy Anil S [this message]
2004-07-19 7:31 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-22 21:55 ` Nathan Lynch
2004-07-22 23:23 ` Keshavamurthy Anil S
2004-07-23 0:33 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040718134559.A25488@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.