All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
To: Wayne Gowcher <wgowcher@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, jsun@mvista.com
Subject: Re: Should pci driver probe behind a cardbus bridge at boot up ?
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:57:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040721115743.C6813@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040720162349.45167.qmail@web11902.mail.yahoo.com>; from wgowcher@yahoo.com on Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:23:49AM -0700

On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:23:49AM -0700, Wayne Gowcher wrote:
> I am having a problem with a Ti cardbus chip and yenta
> on the 2.6.4 mips kernel whereby when yenta tries to
> configure the cardbus chip, it finds all the resources
> busy ( because they have already been allocated in the
> pci driver ) and so starts allocating new ones.
> 
> Here's the output of the PCI driver
> 
> PCI: Bus 1, cardbus bridge: 0000:00:0c.0
>   IO window: 00001000-00001fff
>   IO window: 00002000-00002fff
>   PREFETCH window: 40000000-41ffffff
>   MEM window: 42000000-43ffffff
> PCI: Bus 5, cardbus bridge: 0000:00:0c.1
>   IO window: 00003000-00003fff
>   IO window: 00004000-00004fff
>   PREFETCH window: 44000000-45ffffff
>   MEM window: 46000000-47ffffff
> 
> and here's what yenta reports:
> 
> Yenta: CardBus bridge found at 0000:00:0c.0
> [0000:0000]
> yenta 0000:00:0c.0: Preassigned resource 1 busy,
> reconfiguring...
> Yenta: CardBus bridge found at 0000:00:0c.1
> [0000:0000]
> 
> 
> When I run the same 2.6.4 kernel compiled for x86 on a
> x86 laptop, the x86 kernel finds the bar 0 registers
> of the cardbus chip and adds them to it's resource
> space, but probes no further. So that later when yenta
> probes the cardbus chip, it can allocate the resources
> without conflict.
> 
> I also found the following comment in
> drivers/pci/probe.c pci_scan_bridge :
> 
>  * If it's a bridge, configure it and scan the bus
> behind it.
>  * For CardBus bridges, we don't scan behind as the
> devices will
>  * be handled by the bridge driver itself.
> 
> But the code does scan behind teh cardbus bridge and
> add resources to iomem_resources and ioport_resources.
> 
> So as I wrote in my title, does anyone know if :
> 
> the pci driver should probe behind a cardbus bridge at
> boot up or if it should be left to the yenta cardbus ?
>

It should not - me think anyway.

Maybe you can tell us _why_, given the same code, i386 does
not scan behind yenta.

Jun

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-21 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-20 16:23 Should pci driver probe behind a cardbus bridge at boot up ? Wayne Gowcher
2004-07-21 18:57 ` Jun Sun [this message]
2004-07-22 16:52   ` Wayne Gowcher
2004-07-22 16:52     ` Wayne Gowcher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040721115743.C6813@mvista.com \
    --to=jsun@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=wgowcher@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.