From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266683AbUGVDMf (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:12:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266684AbUGVDMf (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:12:35 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:50069 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266683AbUGVDMe (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:12:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:11:28 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Roland McGrath Cc: ak@muc.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64 singlestep through sigreturn system call Message-Id: <20040721231128.6b495d94.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200407220216.i6M2GqEv007394@magilla.sf.frob.com> References: <200407220216.i6M2GqEv007394@magilla.sf.frob.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roland McGrath wrote: > > > Hmm, but now the behaviour for 32bit processes is different from the > > native 32bit kernel, since 32bit didn't apply any patch so far AFAIK. > > Well, I was (and am) advocating that Davide's patch for native 32-bit be > applied as well. If it is, then my last x86-64 patch covers both 32-bit > and 64-bit cases with minimal cruft. In particular, 2.6.8-rc1-mm1 contains > Davide's patch and both of my earlier x86-64 patches. I hope Andrew will > replace those two patches with the later cleaner single x86-64 patch. If > Linus merges that patch of mine and Davide's i386 patch, I will be a happy > camper. Am now all confused. Please tell me which patches to drop, and ensure that I have the replacement patches, if any. Thanks.