From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dimitri Sivanich Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 04:13:49 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] Patch for isolated scheduler domains Message-Id: <20040723041349.GB15188@sgi.com> List-Id: References: <20040722164126.GB13189@sgi.com> <20040722175459.GA30059@elte.hu> <4100859C.9060409@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4100859C.9060409@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Nick Piggin Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 01:27:24PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Cool. Have you actually tried running it? With Ingo's correction, it > should work fine but I don't think anyone has tested this. > Yup, I've been running it on an Altix. I've created a version for sched.c (all platform) which I'll be posting soon. That will include code for both CONFIG_NUMA_SCHED and non CONFIG_NUMA_SCHED configurations. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267530AbUGWEN5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:13:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267532AbUGWEN5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:13:57 -0400 Received: from [192.48.179.6] ([192.48.179.6]:29275 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267530AbUGWENz (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:13:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:13:49 -0500 From: Dimitri Sivanich To: Nick Piggin Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Patch for isolated scheduler domains Message-ID: <20040723041349.GB15188@sgi.com> References: <20040722164126.GB13189@sgi.com> <20040722175459.GA30059@elte.hu> <4100859C.9060409@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4100859C.9060409@yahoo.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 01:27:24PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Cool. Have you actually tried running it? With Ingo's correction, it > should work fine but I don't think anyone has tested this. > Yup, I've been running it on an Altix. I've created a version for sched.c (all platform) which I'll be posting soon. That will include code for both CONFIG_NUMA_SCHED and non CONFIG_NUMA_SCHED configurations.