From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: preempt timing violations
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:50:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040726085002.GA25519@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1090813907.6936.56.camel@mindpipe>
* Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> Latency with 2.6.8-rc2 + voluntary-preempt-I4 is the best so far.
> After extended testing there only seem to be a few hot spots. In
> several minutes I saw an 11ms violation, a 14ms violation, and several
> 2ms violations.
>
> get_user_pages() is much better in 2.6.8-rc1-mm1 than 2.6.8-rc2. Is
> there any chance of getting the fix into mainline?
in -J3 i've added a cond_resched to the latency-generating point of
get_user_pages(). (The biggest latencies happen via
make_pages_present(), which gets triggered by mlockall()/MAP_LOCKED.)
> 2ms non-preemptible critical section violated 1 ms preempt threshold
> starting at unmap_vmas+0x1ff/0x210 and ending at
> unmap_vmas+0x1f5/0x210
this is the normal sys_exit()->exit_mmap()->unmap_vmas() path. It's
weird that it generated a 2ms latency. What are the values of
voluntary_preemption and kernel_preemption on your current kernel? With
a 2:0 setting we ought to have a reschedule point every 32 pages. Do
you know which application triggers this latency and is it easy to
reproduce?
> 14ms non-preemptible critical section violated 1 ms preempt threshold
> starting at tty_write+0x1b6/0x290 and ending at schedule+0x2fd/0x5b0
does this one trigger when you are using the VGA console? (or fbcon)?
it's not immediately obvious to me precisely where this latency comes
from, it would be nice to know how to reproduce it.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-26 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-26 3:51 preempt timing violations Lee Revell
2004-07-26 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-07-26 9:09 ` Lee Revell
2004-07-26 9:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-26 9:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-26 15:43 ` preempt timing violations (unmap_vmas) Rudo Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040726085002.GA25519@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.