From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH] scsi/osst: replace schedule_timeout()
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:47:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040727224732.GC4537@us.ibm.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2426 bytes --]
I would appreciate any comments from the janitors list. This is one (of
many) cases where I made a decision about replacing
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(some_time);
with
msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(some_time));
msleep() is not exactly the same as the previous code, but I only did
this replacement where I thought long delays were *desired*. If this is
not the case here, then just disregard this patch.
Thanks,
Nish
Applys-to: 2.6.7
Description: Replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() to guarantee the task
delays as desired.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
--- linux-vanilla/drivers/scsi/osst.c 2004-06-15 22:19:22.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-dev/drivers/scsi/osst.c 2004-07-27 15:45:31.000000000 -0700
@@ -613,10 +613,8 @@ static int osst_wait_ready(OS_Scsi_Tape
printk(OSST_DEB_MSG "%s:D: Reached onstream wait ready\n", name);
#endif
- if (initial_delay > 0) {
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(initial_delay);
- }
+ if (initial_delay > 0)
+ msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(initial_delay));
memset(cmd, 0, MAX_COMMAND_SIZE);
cmd[0] = TEST_UNIT_READY;
@@ -637,8 +635,7 @@ static int osst_wait_ready(OS_Scsi_Tape
debugging = 0;
}
#endif
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 10);
+ msleep(100);
memset(cmd, 0, MAX_COMMAND_SIZE);
cmd[0] = TEST_UNIT_READY;
@@ -697,8 +694,7 @@ static int osst_wait_for_medium(OS_Scsi_
debugging = 0;
}
#endif
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 10);
+ msleep(100);
memset(cmd, 0, MAX_COMMAND_SIZE);
cmd[0] = TEST_UNIT_READY;
@@ -818,8 +814,7 @@ static int osst_wait_frame(OS_Scsi_Tape
notyetprinted--;
}
#endif
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout (HZ / OSST_POLL_PER_SEC);
+ msleep(1000 / OSST_POLL_PER_SEC);
}
#if DEBUG
printk (OSST_DEB_MSG "%s:D: Fail wait f fr %i (>%i): %i-%i %i: %3li.%li s\n",
@@ -1420,8 +1415,7 @@ static int osst_read_back_buffer_and_rew
if (SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[2] == 2 && SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[12] == 4 &&
(SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[13] == 1 || SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[13] == 8)) {
/* in the process of becoming ready */
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 10);
+ msleep(100);
continue;
}
if (STp->buffer->syscall_result)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
reply other threads:[~2004-07-27 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040727224732.GC4537@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.