From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265237AbUG1WGy (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:06:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265293AbUG1WGy (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:06:54 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.SGI.COM ([192.48.171.19]:53659 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265237AbUG1WGu (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:06:50 -0400 From: Jesse Barnes To: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't pass mem_map into init functions Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:01:19 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-mm , LSE , Anton Blanchard , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <1091048123.2871.435.camel@nighthawk> In-Reply-To: <1091048123.2871.435.camel@nighthawk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407281501.19181.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, July 28, 2004 1:55 pm, Dave Hansen wrote: > Compile tested on SMP x86 and NUMAQ. I plan to give it a run on ppc64 > in a bit. I'd appreciate if one of the ia64 guys could make sure it's > OK for them as well. Which tree is this against? It doesn't apply to the bk tree or linux-2.6.8-rc2-mm1. Thanks, Jesse From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't pass mem_map into init functions Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:01:19 -0700 References: <1091048123.2871.435.camel@nighthawk> In-Reply-To: <1091048123.2871.435.camel@nighthawk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407281501.19181.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Dave Hansen Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-mm , LSE , Anton Blanchard , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-ID: On Wednesday, July 28, 2004 1:55 pm, Dave Hansen wrote: > Compile tested on SMP x86 and NUMAQ. I plan to give it a run on ppc64 > in a bit. I'd appreciate if one of the ia64 guys could make sure it's > OK for them as well. Which tree is this against? It doesn't apply to the bk tree or linux-2.6.8-rc2-mm1. Thanks, Jesse -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org