From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
To: Joshua Brindle <method@gentoo.org>
Cc: SE-Linux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: temporary hack to use udev in selinux
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:57:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040729005727.GA4335@lkcl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <410844F9.3010203@gentoo.org>
hiya joshua,
a recent release of udev (0.26) from like, two weeks ago
(which i only just noticed) appears to have had its
udev "hard-coded" support removed - and incidentally
the equally hard-coded dbus support removed...
... to be replaced with an /etc/dev.d/something/selinux
which runs restorecon $DEVICE.
and, amazingly, it works.
what is getting my goat at the moment is as i said having
to use /udev instead of /dev.
GREAT. a patch.
it wouldn't have occurred to me to do the inode and special
node stuff.
thanks v. much.
l.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 08:29:45PM -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> >i have a requirement (use of usb-mount, see
> >http://users.actrix.co.nz/michael/usbmount.html) that forces the use
> >of udev on an selinux system.
> >
> >fighting with it for a day, and after seeing some clues in the
> >file contexts (/(u)dev/....) i decided to try editing
> >/etc/udev/udev.conf to set it to use /udev instead of /dev.
> >
> >other than a warning about udev not starting up, well, everything
> >seems to work hunky-dory.
> >
> >somehow i do _get_ a udevd running, i could not tell you how it got
> >there.
> >
> >i notice the following message
> >
> > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2004-March/msg00888.html
> >
> >in which steven (hi steven :) says that support for udev "fake"
> >attributes for ramfs and tmpfs, just like for devpts.
> >
> >is that literally as simple as cut/paste the devpts code...
> >the xattr stuff?
> >
> >cos if so, i _like_ cut/paste :)
> >
> >l.
> >
> >
> >
> Chris PeBenito made this patch for Gentoo when we were evalutating udev
> on selinux
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~method/1330_linux-2.6.5-ramfs-xattr.patch
>
> that should patch cleanly into 2.6.7, but I'd like to note that at this
> point udev is braindead wrt SELinux.
> Once upon a time udev had selinux support integrated so that setfscreate
> was called to set the context of the devices being written however it
> was changed at some point to make SELinux an after device creation addon
> script which makes it label the devices after they are created. Because
> of this Hardened Gentoo has decided not to support udev at this time.
>
>
> Joshua Brindle
--
--
Information I post is with honesty, integrity, and the expectation that
you will take full responsibility if acting on the information contained,
and that, should you find it to be flawed or even mildly useful, you
will act with both honesty and integrity in return - and tell me.
--
<a href="http://lkcl.net"> lkcl.net </a> <br />
<a href="mailto:lkcl@lkcl.net"> lkcl@lkcl.net </a> <br />
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-29 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-28 23:20 temporary hack to use udev in selinux Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-07-29 0:29 ` Joshua Brindle
2004-07-29 0:57 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [this message]
2004-07-29 1:35 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-07-29 2:04 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-07-29 12:47 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-07-29 14:20 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-07-29 16:57 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-07-29 17:06 ` James Morris
2004-07-29 17:22 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-07-29 20:05 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-07-29 20:09 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-07-31 1:43 ` Russell Coker
2004-07-31 16:35 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-08-01 10:31 ` Russell Coker
2004-08-01 12:03 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-08-02 13:10 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-01 12:11 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-08-02 12:38 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-02 12:35 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-07-29 20:59 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-07-29 22:11 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-07-29 14:22 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-07-29 14:35 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-07-29 17:04 ` James Morris
2004-07-29 20:56 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-07-29 12:43 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-07-29 13:53 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-07-29 14:25 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-07-29 12:36 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-07-29 13:57 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040729005727.GA4335@lkcl.net \
--to=lkcl@lkcl.net \
--cc=method@gentoo.org \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.