From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267438AbUG2VaL (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:30:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265256AbUG2V21 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:28:27 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:55744 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267438AbUG2VZS (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:25:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:28:29 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted Message-Id: <20040729142829.2a75c9b9.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040729100307.GA23571@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20040729100307.GA23571@devserv.devel.redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > Below is a fixed up patch to allow non-root to mlock memory I seem to recall that Andrea identified reasons why per-user mlock limits were fundamentally broken/unsuitable, but I forget the details. Perhaps he could remind us? As for this patch: it's a new capability which will get basically zero testing for the next year, which is a worry. How have you tested it, and how much?