All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:09:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040730020910.GA30369@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040729185215.Q1973@build.pdx.osdl.net>

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:52:15PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> 1) hugetlb accounting is not done. so it's only simple change to checking
> permission, but the acutal usage is not tracked (gets back to problem
> andrea pointed out).  with this patch, wouldn't !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)
> && rlim[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur == 1 be enough to get all the hugepages
> a user would want (i.e. security hole)?

exactly, you beaten me on reply-speed ;).

And this patch is needed primarly to get access to hugetlbfs without
IPC_CAP_LOCK as Arjan mentioned.

> I do agree, however, that storing in user struct allows for quota like
> accounting that matches the shm_lock and hugetlb use cases.

Looking forward to see hugetlbfs working with user quota too...
rlimit user-quota is certainly a reasonable approach, though I'm not
sure what happens if root runs chown, that's funny not? Comments?

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-30  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-29 10:03 [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted Arjan van de Ven
2004-07-29 21:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-29 21:40   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-07-30  0:50     ` Rik van Riel
2004-07-30  2:16       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-07-30  0:51   ` Rik van Riel
2004-07-30  2:17     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-07-30  1:52 ` Chris Wright
2004-07-30  2:09   ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2004-07-30  2:46   ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-03 20:54   ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-03 21:45     ` Chris Wright
2004-08-03 20:55   ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-03 21:07     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 21:13       ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-08-03 21:36         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 21:38           ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-08-03 21:51             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 22:01               ` Chris Wright
2004-08-03 22:11                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 22:33                   ` Chris Wright
2004-08-03 22:42                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 22:52                       ` Chris Wright
2004-08-04  1:21                   ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  1:53                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-04  2:01                       ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  2:13                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-04  2:20                           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-04  2:22                           ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  2:31                             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-04  2:56                               ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  6:06                                 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-04 13:31                                   ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04 13:51                                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-08-04 13:56                                       ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  3:13                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-04  2:25                           ` Chris Wright
2004-08-04  2:07                       ` Chris Wright
2004-08-04  2:18                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 21:13       ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-03 21:22         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 21:24           ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-08-03 21:31           ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-03 21:39             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-04  1:56               ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-03 22:18             ` Gerrit Huizenga
2004-08-04  1:22               ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  1:37                 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2004-08-04  1:55                   ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040730020910.GA30369@dualathlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.