From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267823AbUG3U1j (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:27:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267835AbUG3U1i (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:27:38 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:58329 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267831AbUG3U1Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:27:25 -0400 From: Jesse Barnes To: Vojtech Pavlik Subject: Re: Exposing ROM's though sysfs Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:26:48 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Jon Smirl , Torrey Hoffman , lkml References: <1091207136.2762.181.camel@rohan.arnor.net> <20040730172433.2312.qmail@web14924.mail.yahoo.com> <20040730191448.GA2461@ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20040730191448.GA2461@ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407301326.48094.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, July 30, 2004 12:14 pm, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > I'm starting to think that using emu86 always (independent on the > architecture) would be best. It's not like the execution speed is the > limit with video init, and it'll allow to find more bugs in emu86 when > it's used on i386 as well. It'll be needed for x86-64 (AMD64 and intel > EM64T) anyway. Yeah, I was thinking the same thing, but emu86 needs some fixes to work on an x86 host apparently... Jesse