From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BqfAb-0002SX-Fn for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:44:05 -0700 Received: from w218.z064002068.nyc-ny.dsl.cnc.net ([64.2.68.218]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BqfAa-0007S9-Pf for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:44:05 -0700 From: Allen Chan References: <200407280315.08207.alydar@users.sourceforge.net> <410A833F.9030207@hevanet.com> <200407301849.i6UInpUE003226@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <200407301849.i6UInpUE003226@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407301744.02391.alydar@users.sourceforge.net> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: Bug#260111: user-mode-linux: upgrade hangs at "NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 " Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:44:00 -0400 To: Jeff Dike Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net FYI... The same problem occurs in the 2.6.7-1um kernel after applying the remove-user-code patch from the "Current patches" site. Except this time, instead of hanging, the guest kernel simply exits without warning. The last output lines before exiting were: ...... [snipped] ...... Initializing stdio console driver kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds While compiling chan_kern.c, the following warnings were issued: CC arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.o arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.c: In function `generic_console_write': arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.c:121: warning: implicit declaration of function `isatty' arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.c:122: warning: implicit declaration of function `tcgetattr' arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.c:125: warning: implicit declaration of function `tcsetattr' arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.c: At top level: arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.c:79: warning: `not_configged_ops' defined but not used While isatty() is in and tcgetattr() and tcsetattr() are in in /usr/include, there does not appear to exist equivalent kernel header files that will make those warnings go away for chan_kern.c. Do these functions have to be implemented differently if placed at the kernel level? On Friday 30 July 2004 02:49 pm, Jeff Dike wrote: > Yeah, this definitely needs more investigation. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel