From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267677AbUG3Vmr (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:42:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267695AbUG3Vmr (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:42:47 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:64729 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267677AbUG3Vmq (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:42:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:42:44 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Jeff Garzik Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve pci_alloc_consistent wrapper on preemptive kernels Message-Id: <20040730234244.16e9f99f.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <410A8E7D.2030009@pobox.com> References: <20040730190227.29913e23.ak@suse.de> <410A826C.4000508@pobox.com> <20040730194304.2c27f48c.ak@suse.de> <410A8E7D.2030009@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:07:57 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Certainly. Therefore, changing from GFP_ATOMIC will increase likelihood > of breakage, no? No, except for places that are already broken on preemptive kernels (and note this change only does something on preemptive kernels) -Andi