From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: post-OLS pending cpufreq patches Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:52:08 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040802205208.GE12724@redhat.com> References: <20040727205126.GB9438@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040802193350.GA15740@redhat.com> <20040802204231.GB8795@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040802204231.GB8795@dominikbrodowski.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:42:31PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:33:50PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > > > - [speedstep-centrino] SMP support [Venkatesh Pallipadi] > > > looks good, IMO, but needs to be adapted to Jeremey's patch which > > > should go in first, IMO. > > > > merged. > > Actually, I can't see that in either bk or snapshot... However, I guess it > needs a bit of re-work after all the changes done in the past few hours. Ok, I'm done merging bits for now, and I've just refreshed the patch at http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/bitkeeper/cpufreq/cpufreq-2004-08-02.diff if you have anything else, please send incrementals against that. Hmm, actually, there's going to be one more fix needed. Something I just merged broke things. (Or I missed a dependancy). CC arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.o arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c: In function `speedstep_target': arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c:250: warning: implicit declaration of function `speedstep_get' arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c: At top level: arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c:363: error: conflicting types 2 Dave