From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.7 speedstep-piix4 on vaio Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 23:31:23 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040802213123.GC24329@dominikbrodowski.de> References: <43210.141.228.156.225.1091110800.squirrel@141.228.156.225> <20040729210413.GA7782@dominikbrodowski.de> <200407302020.50451.ivor@ivor.org> <20040802193141.GB17023@redhat.com> <20040802202729.GB8265@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040802204921.GD12724@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040802204921.GD12724@redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dave Jones Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:49:21PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > I'd like to live in a utopia where broken hardware doesn't exist too, but > last time I checked, neither I, nor Linus does 8-) > I've not had any problems merging such entries with him in the past that > I can recall. Excellent. Andrew just pushed the "difficult" patch to Linus again, so I'm still hopeful :) > > I don't know what the general consensus on a big (~50? 100?) table is. > > I'll bet you can get the more common models in much less entries than that. > Given its now an end of life'd chipset, its not like we'll ever see > new entries once we have the more common ones too. Plus we'd only > need entries from models that deviate from the defaults, and finally > we'd need input from users, which at times, can be hard to gather anyway. > So I'm sceptical that we'll see 50-100 entries. Let's see. Got one affected system here locally... Dominik