From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>
Subject: Re: Solving suspend-level confusion
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:30:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408032030.41410.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1091588163.5225.77.camel@gaston>
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 19:56, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Actually, I took a shortcut with my PPC implementation of swsusp,
> which was to tweak the numbering of PM_SUSPEND_* so that
>
> PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY = 1
> PM_SUSPEND_MEM = 3
> PM_SUSPEND_DISK = 4
>
> Which has the "side effect" of matching S states and mostly D states
> with the exception of disk, for the few drivers that care...
So long as there's a comment explaining what's going on there
("original PCI PM API compatibility") this wins hugely on expedience!
> But in the long run, this may add confusion instead of clearing things,
> I agree we should rather move to completely different types, though I
> don't feel like re-typing every callbacks in the tree right now...
Me either. But renumbering the PM_SUSPEND_* values would let folk
start discussing what PM should be (and do) without that particular
pressure.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-04 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-30 16:44 Solving suspend-level confusion Pavel Machek
2004-07-30 22:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-07-30 23:06 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-31 4:02 ` David Brownell
2004-07-31 4:36 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-31 5:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-07-31 14:23 ` David Brownell
2004-07-31 17:01 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-31 17:51 ` David Brownell
2004-08-01 0:41 ` David Brownell
2004-08-01 1:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-02 16:38 ` David Brownell
2004-08-03 0:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-04 2:28 ` David Brownell
2004-08-04 2:26 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-04 2:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-04 2:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-04 4:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-04 4:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-04 4:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-04 4:54 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-04 5:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-04 5:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-05 10:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-05 22:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-06 0:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-06 21:30 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-06 21:29 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-06 22:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-06 22:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-06 21:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-05 1:29 ` David Brownell
2004-08-05 10:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-06 0:32 ` David Brownell
[not found] ` <1091772799.2532.50.camel@laptop.cunninghams>
2004-08-07 22:24 ` David Brownell
2004-08-04 2:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-04 3:30 ` David Brownell [this message]
2004-08-04 4:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-04 4:47 ` What PM should be and do (Was Re: Solving suspend-level confusion) Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-04 4:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-04 4:59 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-08 16:54 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-08 21:55 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-09 8:42 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-05 18:19 ` Greg KH
2004-08-05 22:14 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-07 0:08 ` Éric Brunet
2004-08-08 19:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-11 21:23 ` Greg KH
2004-08-08 0:54 ` David Brownell
2004-08-06 21:21 ` Solving suspend-level confusion Pavel Machek
2004-07-31 21:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-02 16:40 ` David Brownell
2004-08-03 0:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-07 23:30 ` David Brownell
2004-08-06 21:10 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-07 23:23 ` David Brownell
2004-08-08 17:16 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-06 20:04 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-07 22:14 ` David Brownell
2004-08-07 23:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200408032030.41410.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@digitalimplant.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.