From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Samad Subject: Re: OR with the --set-mark flag Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:10:02 +1000 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040804041002.GJ21117@samad.com.au> References: <20040803151102.30082.31199.Mailman@vishnu.netfilter.org> <41101528.6080609@metavize.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HuscSE0D68UGttcd" Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41101528.6080609@metavize.com> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --HuscSE0D68UGttcd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I believe there is a patch in pom that allow this but it patches iptables as well as the kernel Alex On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 03:43:52PM -0700, Robert Scott wrote: > It appears that using the MARK target "--set-mark " option always= =20 > overwrites whatever mark is already there with . Is there a way= =20 > to perform an OR operation with what is already there? >=20 > --rb >=20 >=20 --HuscSE0D68UGttcd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBEGGakZz88chpJ2MRAlXoAKCkcIAClqzGQahH6WbuqVyKaliyDACfSmkA avHc4ePo8ObNc0d9lnSqwXo= =c3rb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HuscSE0D68UGttcd--