From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mjt@nysv.org Markus =?unknown-8bit?q?T=F6rnqvist?= Subject: Re: http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:55:13 +0300 Message-ID: <20040804095513.GL1284@nysv.org> References: <200406150022.34578.vitaly@namesys.com> <200408031750.00291.vitaly@namesys.com> <20040803135805.GK1284@nysv.org> <200408031819.51600.vitaly@namesys.com> <4110A38A.7040807@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4110A38A.7040807@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans Reiser Cc: Vitaly Fertman , reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 01:51:22AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: >These blocks refers to blocks that were used by files and are now backup >super blocks? These blocks could be critical database files, etc.? Seems to me like yes, but Reiser4 hasn't launched yet officially, so I somehow doubt people will have anything too critical on Reiser4. I'm at least preparing myself to take backups of everything. >If yes, then please pull this off our website until you come up with a >scheme that I am sure will not create more user problems than it solves, >on average. Yeah, there is the other hand that said that the online format is now set in stone... Still the important question is, what's the net gain of this new format? -- mjt