All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mjt@nysv.org
To: Philippe@nysv.org, Gramoull@nysv.org
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:50:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040804125025.GP1284@nysv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040804144144.2f5fe7b3@philou.gramoulle.local>

On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:41:44PM +0200, Philippe Gramoull? wrote:
>As Markus said, Reiser4 hasn't been officially released, so i'm all for format disk change if it improves things in the end
>and even if few people might get burnt with that.

For now, I just hope no one jumps the gun and fscks with the new
tools, unless they REALLY have to.

Point is, maybe the block could be relocated without data loss?
Is that not much more elegant a solution?

I'm at least waiting for Vitaly to comment on this issue, if it really
is too difficult or impossible, then we all risk data loss.
C'est la software beta.

But even if there was some misunderstanding between Vitaly and Hans
about data loss (Hans did say that there will be no inelegant format
changes), the new backup layout sounds like a reasonable and good idea.

-- 
mjt



  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-04 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-14 20:22 http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.06.14-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-06-14 21:05 ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.06.14-internal.testing/ mjt
2004-06-14 21:27   ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.06.14-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-06-16 11:58 ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.06.14-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-06-16 15:44   ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.06.14-internal.testing/ Sander Sweers
2004-06-16 16:08     ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.06.14-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-07-13 10:27 ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.07.13-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-07-13 10:54   ` [PATCH] http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.07.13-internal.testing/ Philippe Gramoullé
2004-07-13 12:06     ` Vitaly Fertman
2004-08-03 13:50   ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-08-03 13:58     ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ mjt
2004-08-03 14:19       ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-08-04  8:51         ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Hans Reiser
2004-08-04  9:55           ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ mjt
2004-08-04 10:34             ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-08-04 10:52               ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ mjt
2004-08-04 12:49                 ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-08-04 12:56                   ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ mjt
2004-08-04 12:41             ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Philippe Gramoullé
2004-08-04 12:50               ` mjt [this message]
2004-08-04 13:49               ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Chris Mason
2004-08-04 14:16                 ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Thomas Graham
2004-08-04 14:22                   ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ mjt
2004-08-04 17:47                     ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Hans Reiser
2004-08-04 18:21                       ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ mjt
2004-08-04 18:51                       ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-08-04 21:44                         ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Hans Reiser
2004-08-09 19:49                           ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.09-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-08-04  3:33     ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Thomas Graham
2004-08-04  8:44       ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Hans Reiser
2004-08-04 10:16         ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ Vitaly Fertman
2004-08-04 10:28           ` http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.03-internal.testing/ mjt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040804125025.GP1284@nysv.org \
    --to=mjt@nysv.org \
    --cc=Gramoull@nysv.org \
    --cc=Philippe@nysv.org \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.